Spring ‘25 Schedule

Below are details of what each of our speakers will be focusing on in their talk. Each talk will be held in-person, and is to be followed by a reception. All are welcome!

Locations will be added once we have confirmed them. In the event that you are interested in attending a given talk, but cannot do so in-person, Zoom registration is available below.

Black Femicide and Toni Morrison and W.E.B. Du Bois’s Democratic Storytelling with Shatema Threadcraft

Tuesday, January 28 | 4 - 5:30 pm ET | Location TBA | Zoom Registration

Black women are 10% of the US female population yet represent 59% of women murdered. Most of those deaths were instances of intimate partner violence, and thus a form of Black femicide. More pregnant women are murdered than die of the top three pregnancy-related complications, and in the US Black women account for 44.6% of all instances of pregnancy-related fatal, intimate partner violence. Maternal- and abortion-related deaths are considered a form of “passive” femicide, and in the US 57% of Black women of reproductive age live under abortion bans or severe abortion restrictions. Black women are three times more likely to die of pregnancy-related complications than white women.

Despite all this, more people are mobilized in response to the deaths of Black men than those of Black women. Kimberlé Crenshaw understands this asymmetry as partially rooted in Black women’s lack of “narrative capital,” and Crenshaw has called on women to “share their stories” of violence in order to redistribute such capital and occasion greater mobilization. But those who call on Black women to share their stories of private violence must reflect, not only on the complications of sharing publicly these stories of violent intimacy, but on how Black political leaders like W.E.B. Du Bois have written spectacular violence, and specifically lynching, into the story of who Blacks are and why they are here. In this talk, Professor Threadcraft (author of Intimate Justice: The Black Female Body and the Body Politic, Oxford University Press 2016) explores the people-making stories of Du Bois alongside Toni Morrison’s stories, focusing on the deaths Morrison centers in her work; the ephemeral collectives she sought to build through her tales of intimate violence and death; and how she would have such stories shared to argue for a more effective method of storytelling to increase mobilization in response to Black women’s deaths.

“Not Like Us”: Respect, Standing, and White Tribalism with Lionel McPherson

Tuesday, February 11 | 4 - 5:30 pm ET | Location TBA | Zoom Registration

There are supposed to be deep contradictions between Enlightenment moral ideals and inherited slavery. This has led to undying inquiry into Western slavery’s moral justification, as if such a possibility were conceivable. The standard story locates normative error in mistaken beliefs about human beings or vicious attitudes now commonly understood to be racist. In this talk, Professor McPherson (author of The Afterlife of Race: An Informed Philosophical Search, Oxford University Press 2024 ) rejects that story and its underlying emphasis on lack of respect for enslaved Africa-identified persons (“blacks”) by “white” Europeans. Social standing, McPherson argues, is normatively more fundamental than respect. Acknowledged status as human beings does not presuppose or rationally entail social standing as members of a law-governed community that ultimately answers to its own insider norms and prerogatives.

Boxed In: Making Identities Safe for Democracy with Derrick Darby

Tuesday, March 25 | 4 - 5:30 pm ET | Location TBA | Zoom Registration

Talk details are forthcoming.

Forging (and Challenging) “a Tyrannical Public Opinion”: Du Bois and Terrel on Confederate Faithful Slave Monuments with Juliet Hooker

Tuesday, April 8 | 4 - 5:30 pm ET | Location TBA | Zoom Registration

What is lost when Confederate monuments are removed? Whose civic standing is diminished by their defacement or removal? Opponents of Confederate statue removal claim that their goal is to preserve history. Yet in 1935, in Black Reconstruction, W.E.B. Du Bois identified Lost Cause historiography as “pure propaganda”: a deliberate disinformation campaign to enshrine white supremacist fictions as official history. While they could not prevent Confederate monuments from being built, African American intellectuals challenged the distorted Lost Cause version of US history enshrined in both the written record and the visual rhetoric of Confederate monuments. None embody this struggle over how to teach US history and who to publicly commemorate more than the attempt to build so-called “faithful slave” monuments. In this talk, Professor  Hooker (author of Black Grief/White Grievance: The Politics of Loss, Princeton University Press 2023) focuses on the arguments marshalled by Mary Church Terrell and Du Bois to successfully challenge the proposal of the United Daughters of the Confederacy to build a national monument to the ‘Black Mammy’ in the 1920s, and the eventual contextualization of the Haywood Shepherd memorial installed at Harper’s Ferry in 1931. Terrell and Du Bois recognized that the battle over the written and visual record are inextricably linked, and that both can be harmful forms of racist demagoguery that threaten freedom of opinion, displace African American collective memory, and subvert national history. Contemporary attempts to safeguard statues, whitewash the teaching of US history, and ban books demonstrate that struggles over the kinds of monuments an egalitarian multiracial democracy requires are ongoing. How should we commemorate today?

The Dread of Tyrants: Frederick Douglass on Dignity and the Liberty of Thought and Expression with Ronald Sundstrom

April 22 | 4 - 5:30 pm ET | Location TBA | Zoom Registration

Frederick Douglass (c. 1817 - 1895), an American former slave, abolitionist leader, and icon, justified the liberties of thought and expression, encompassing opinion, literacy, and speech. His defense of freedom of thought and expression was directly connected to his principal mission to declaim and argue against slavery and the subjugation of Black Americans. The struggle for these liberties was at the core of his narrative of personal development and the blossoming of self-respect, and it drove his commitment to moral suasion in the abolitionist cause and the realization of equal citizenship for all. His justification of these liberties and the ultimate purpose he believed they served is a valuable contribution to classic nineteenth-century moral and political theories of freedom. In this talk, Professor Sundstrom (author of Just Shelter: Integration, Gentrification, and Race and Reconstruction, Oxford University Press 2023) explains Douglass’ view of the liberties of thought and expression by appealing to some of his key speeches and scenes from his autobiographical writings. Beyond the importance and detail of Douglass’ argument is the value of what grounds them. Sundstrom contends that Douglass based those liberties on a view of human dignity that is irreducibly moral and existential, which should, in turn, form and guide those liberties in a democratic and egalitarian direction.